Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Sarah Fraser Show / Little Pink Monsters Blogger"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I feel like with kanes anxiety he’d have had good life insurance with girls as the beneficiaries. There is no way she could not be working if she didn’t have those trusts to pull from (not that she shouldn’t pull from them!) [/quote] If there are trusts, they wouldn’t support Natasha or her son. [/quote] Wouldn’t she also get child support from her second husband? [/quote] CS doesn’t support the mother and certainly doesn’t pay for 100% of the child’s needs. No one knows what he does, their custody arrangement, or what CS would possibly be for the son.[/quote] Well it’s clear she living entirely off of support from ex-husbands which would lean towards child support. I lose a lot of respect for her here.[/quote] How is it clear? None of us know if she works. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
