Reply to ECNL rising, GA falling . . . Where will the 06 and younger D1-thinking girls go?

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "ECNL rising, GA falling . . . Where will the 06 and younger D1-thinking girls go? "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If there was no COVID, DA might not have folded as bad but it also helped prevent ECNL taking all the top ex-DA players.  Now that we are coming back to a normalized society, we’ll see ECNL clubs be the destination club for many of the best players.  It’s just the way it is.  Yes, McLean doesn’t have great track record of developing players.  They don’t need to, because players go there for the older teams and coaches.  Because of the platform (league).

And that’s why VDA will succeed and BRYC will return to a viable option.  But if Arlington ever gets girls ECNL, lawd have mercy.[/quote]

Dude, all of the best DA, clubs, teams and players were ECNL teams and players. The DA was nothing more than a snatch and grab with a rebranding. For some reason, people keep over looking this highly important fact. 95 percent or more of the original ECNL clubs are back in the fold. Only a few remain GA...and it’s not by choice.

Every league has survived COVID. Let’s not make fake excuses of why the league didn’t succeed.

The ECNL survived an outright coup to steal their league when negotiations fell apart. The ECNL won and is still here despite the hostile takeover attempt and COVID.

You think a bunch of rebranded NPL teams and two former ECNL clubs turns DA turned GA and blocked from being ECNL is going to compete with ECNL? Let get real about this conversation.

USSF created this mess. No one else. Stop blaming anyone else.

We, on ECNL teams,welcome all talented players. Please come tryout. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics