Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Parents: Would you support a teacher strike if it means there is no DL?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]New press release from WTU has them continuing to maybe possibly talk about a strike but probably that's just them trying to grasp as some sort of power: https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/wtulocal6action/pages/406/attachments/original/1612286384/2-2-21_WTU_Teachers_Want_to_Go_Back_to_School_and_Want_It_Done_Safely.pdf?1612286384[/quote] Former union leader: this is part of the problem with their inconsistent messaging. The website link we were looking at here earlier indicated that avoiding an illegal strike would be possible if DCPS fully met its obligations per the MOA as well as full vaccination. This communication drops the vaccination requirement and instead requests that the arbitrator go back through the school safety evaluation again, which was presumably completed very recently. Almost certainly the result would be the same, with the possible improvement of the two closed schools--this result would harm, rather than help, the union's negotiating position. To negotiate successfully with management, you need consistent messaging and asks. It's not clear to me exactly what the WTU needs in order to be pacified, and remember that both of these documents are public and official. Behind closed doors, it's unlikely that their demands are any more coherent. They agreed to the MOU and arbitration and didn't like the results. It is not good strategy to reject things you have agreed to, otherwise what is the point of management attempting to meet your demands? If management no longer feels like this conflict can be resolved through pacification, they will move to other (namely legal) strategies. That brings us to "bad faith" negotiation. If the underlying WTU goal is to simply stop IPL and not something like "full vaccination" or "better HVAC," this is negotiating in bad faith. This is a legal issue, and another point on which DCPS could sue for unfair labor practices. Often it's management which is subject to accusations of bad faith, but it can be used against unions. Here's more information about it: https://www.aaup.org/sites/default/files/files/Good%20Faith%20Bargaining%20Handout.pdf You can see that the WTU is skirting, if not crossing, the line here. And then the WTU is going to antagonize DCPS, the mayor, and the arbitrator? No no no no no.[/quote] I probably should have said appeasement, rather than pacification.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics