Reply to Shortage of "economically attractive" men reason for marriage decline according to new study

Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)

Reply to "Shortage of "economically attractive" men reason for marriage decline according to new study"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This situation also highlights some of the ADVANTAGES that "power couples" have.  Two focused parents, two high-end earners, and two strong social networks provides exponential value to the family.  Been around a lot of women who earn north of 500K even after stepping back from their careers for a few years when their kids were young.  Their husbands all make more.  Its the optimal way to proceed and I can see why younger women are pursuing that path - I did and there are too many examples around to miss the value.  [/quote]

I'd agree and raise you. TWO hands-on parents with whatever income, will always beat out ONE hands-on parent with super high incomes. 
And yes, two hands-on, involved parents, both high-earners will win the child-raising game, wealth game, happiness game every time.  
So, yeah, guys, outsource everything to your working wife and illiterate paid help so you can focus on office work -- just know that you will never beat the family with two Partners, coaching sports, knowing their kids, having a healthy social life, and killing it at their careers. [/quote]

lol this makes no sense

A super high income = elite social network. It means c-suite executive, partner, managing director, early investor, etc. etc.

That type of social network will always beat out two mediocre middle manager careers. Sorry.[/quote]

+ 1

That response made no sense.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics