Reply to Naviance is wrong

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Naviance is wrong"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]For my son, white male, high stats, good but not out of the park ecs and awards, no hooks--Naviance was a surprisingly spot on predictor for schools where there was sufficient data.  For schools where under 20 or so from his public high school applied in the last 3 years and/or less than 20% are admitted overall, I didn't make assumptions based on Naviance but instead looked at their [b]Common Data Sets [/b]and considered them reaches unless he was above the 75% in which case they became targets (not safeties).  I would say those were pretty spot on too.  He got into all his targets and safeties and one of his reaches.  But I work with data sets and statistics a lot as part of my job so I understand the many limits on the kinds of inferences I can make from different data sources so maybe I'm more cautious in calling something a "target" vs. a "safety" vs a "reach" than others.  [/quote]

Can you comment on what other factors besides 75%ile we should look at in the Common Data Sets to help understand the institution and fit with our DCs?  I'm new to this and not clear on what to be looking at/for with these college stats.[/quote]

Grit, effort and analysis always yields results.  Good for you and your son.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics