Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Private & Independent Schools
Reply to "Sidwell college advisor leaves"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It's somewhat difficult to judge this whole situation without knowing the specific nature of what the parent communicated to the college, whether the information was true/relevant, and whether the school had suppressed the information in the interest of protecting its own reputation.[/quote] Nope, there is NEVER a time when someone should be anonymously sending notes to colleges to disparage other kids. Never. That is just batsh1t crazy.[/quote] Given all that’s come out in the last few days, I’m no longer willing to be that definitive in condemning the parent (even if I’d never do it myself). It all depends. Admissions and outplacement have been corrupted, so how can an applicant know that relevant negative information about competing applicants isn’t being suppressed? When a corrupted person is so highly regarded that they are giving Sasha and Malia private tennis lessons at the WH (what is more vetted than that?), how can a parent believe that they should just relax and trust the process?[/quote] No honey, it’s never ok to do that. It won’t help your kid anyway. On another note, these private schools need to increase the number of counselors. The ratio is just too high. [/quote] Lecturing people about ethics while adopting an openly misogynistic tone. Well played![/quote] New poster. "Honey" is not misogynistic. It's condescending -- probably deliberately used that way -- and can be applied to either sex, male or female. :roll: [/quote] Of course it is... just as calling someone "boy" is meant to invoke racial imagery, using "honey" as a condescending expression is meant to invoke the stereotype of the uneducated and helpless female, whether it's directed at a male or female. If directed towards a male, it's not really different to saying to a straight person that their dump POV is "gay." So, yes, it's misogynistic. Incidentally, the US government calls it out as an example of sexual harassment: https://www.doi.gov/pmb/eeo/Sexual-Harassment[/quote] Per that link, Biden is in deeeeep trouble. "Examples of Sexual Harassment Any of these elements may constitute sexual harassment or discrimination. These examples are not meant to be all inclusive. Physical contact Squeezing a worker's shoulders or putting a hand around his or her waist..."[/quote] Thanks for posting, Sen. Gillibrand. Your tactics may have worked with Al Franken, but it won’t work with Biden. America now sees you for the craven hypocrite that you are. Trump was perhaps right about one thing: you will do anything for money and to get ahead in politics. You’re a loser.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics