Reply to Where are your kids Getting in?

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Where are your kids Getting in?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]That’s just recalculating.  It is not the same thing as using the high school’s weighting.[/quote]

Exactly. They don’t use the high school weighting. They use their own.

[/quote]

[b]Well I have yet to see any student under a 4.0 get into UMCP this year on college confidential [/b]unless their weighted was above 4.0. I highly doubt the kids admitted here are smarter than these top schools with lower GPA averages. Something doesn’t add up here.

Looking at average GPA here:

UMCP 4.3

Penn 3.9
Brown 4.0
UC Berkeley 3.8
Harvard 4.1
UMich 3.8
MIT 4.1
Wisc 3.8
Notre Dame 4.0
BU 3.6
Georgetown 4.0
USC 3.7
Williams 4.0 
UVA 4.1

[/quote]
If you’re using College Confidential as your data source you’re doing it wrong.[/quote]

This data may come from Common Data Sets, though, which comes directly from the colleges.  What I've seen is publics like UNC Chapel Hill may have higher GPAs than any top private.  (UNC-CH also has higher GPAs than UVA and W&M, BTW.)  This may just mean those states have grade inflation at the high school level.[/quote]

Colleges are permitted to submit GPA data in their common data set as they see fit. Some reports contain unweighted, while others have weighted, recalculated, or no GPA data at all. The UMCP average GPA is obviously weighted and is pretty worthless considering all of the MCPS kids with ridiculously inflated GPAs in the mix.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics