Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Is playing a sport in college "worth it"?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Playing soccer at the jhu/williams is not high level and very easy to obtain if you are a bench player on an academy team with decent grades. we are an below average asian family of poor genetics when it comes to athleticism and have had two in our family play at top 10 lac's for soccer. the soccer pool at the strong academic d3 schools is really bad from a technical standpoint. If you are focused on being in the best aerobic shape possibly and you have a modicum of skill, you can make it. I am 10 years older than my siblings and when I found out how large the hook was for being recruited, we devised a plan for my younger siblings so that they became the best athletes they could be. At the d3 level for soccer, i believe the average american could play at that level if they focused on training from ages 9-17 on that specific goal. pretty much any race is more athletically inclined than mine, so if we can do it - your average umc white family can do it. you guys have better athletic genetics and richer resources for training. but it does require focus and dedication if you aren't athletically blessed. we used it only as a hook to get in. both people in my family quit after one season. [/quote] Probably the same nutball given the overlap in some phrases. Might even be Bloggy McTinfoilhat. Hey Bloggy! Just poor reasoning, factually untrue, and creepily race-focused. Yeesh. We are suburban Maryland public with a decent, somewhat competitive soccer team, meaning we smoke the teams with kids who play soccer as a second or conditioning sport and get handled by schools with dedicated players. Even so, making varsity soccer at our school isn’t anywhere near reasonable for a kid with poor skills and “aerobic shape”. The kids running cross country, for instance, who have “aerobic shape” wouldn’t have a prayer without a long history of club ball or some incredible latent talent. And yet we might have one or two who could possibly play at Williams, the perennial D3 athletic powerhouse. Very few move on to college soccer. Girls lacrosse is much more common to land D3 and even D1 spots, but that’s a sport where we’re more competitive as a region so kind of an anomaly. In sum, you’re wrong and pretty strange. [/quote] You did read the part where I said the player in question needs to be at the level of a reserve player in the academy system. Which in the grand scheme of things is not a high technical level. I've attended training sessions at williams in the past (they run id clinics in the late springs/summer every year - i was there in 2009 and two years ago) and when you see the speed in which the ball moves, and tactical decision making of the kids at that level it isn't great. nothing creepy about me mentioning race. it was a small component. For example, manchester city scouts recently were exposed to mentioning players were "bbqs" - standnig for big, black, quick - in scouting reports. What i'm trying to say is for academic focused d3 schools, the level required to play can be 'trained' for by an average athlete if they focus at it. Of the four compenents of a footballer - technical, tactical, physical, and mental/psychosocial - the d3 levels skews HEAVILY to the physical side - which is the easiest to train for. [/quote] They were exposed because it was horrible. Yet you offer it as some sort of defense. Lord you’re racist AND dumb. [/quote] I'm sure the best trainer on the planet, pep guardiola, is going to sternly lecture them :lol: If you have any experience with european or south american scouts, they are WAY less PC. [/quote] Yes, categorizing people by race for some athletic evaluative purpose is merely PC, not racist. And I don’t care who he is, [b]he’s a douchebag racist. [/b][/quote] Well, this level of functioning is too common among coaches - is this who you want your child spending lots of time with in college? And how come no one has mentioned U of Maryland football? Unless you’ve been living under a bridge for 30 years you should know what heatstroke looks like and still, in 2018, a student football player died under a coaches care. Do these programs really care about your student or is your kid just in a ring to fight lions for other people’s viewing pleasure? [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics