Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Should Asians boycott some elite universities that practice holistic admissions?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The Supreme Court will be moving to the right, 5-4, solid conservative. Hopeful, no more robbing deserving Peter to pay URM Paul. [/quote] Discrimination against Asian Americans will finally end. [/quote] What discrimination? 5% of the population get 22% of the slots. With numbers like that, the status quo is what you want. [/quote] Harvard's own internal study shows Asians should make up 43%. (Same as what CalTech is now.)[/quote] No it does not.[/quote] https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/harvard-defends-integrity-of-admissions-in-response-to-allegation-of-bias-against-asian-americans/ "An internal Harvard University review from five years ago suggested Asian American applicants would be let into the undergraduate college in much greater numbers if academic performance were the only criterion for admission, according to court documents made public Friday. The review by Harvard’s Office of Institutional Research, uncovered by the plaintiff in a federal lawsuit, appeared to indicate that applicants of Asian descent would comprise 43 percent of the admitted class at the ultra-selective university[b] under a hypothetical “academics-only” model.[/b] That was higher than the shares shown for other racial and ethnic groups in the review of admissions data spanning several years."[/quote] 'if academic performance were the only criterion for admission." But it's not.[/quote] Not sure what non-academic criteria a university whose business is to educate students is supposed to be using. Caltech is strictly academic. Caltech students fare better than most Ivy League students under any measurable performance standards post college. [/quote] And CalTech is an option available to you if that’s what you want and you have the scores to get accepted. But many undergrads — especially people leaving home and attending a residential college — want to be in an educational environment where people study subjects other than STEM, where people value getting to know people with different experiences and perspectives, where [b]the arts are a vital part of campus life[/b], etc. And, as the [b]amicus briefs from military[/b] and corporate leaders suggest, many employers see exposure to a diverse environment as a crucial component in the education of future leaders.[/quote] The military amicus brief said "the arts are a vital part of campus life"? Sorry, but the purpose of the military is to defends - and at times when Bush or Trump say so - to invade other countries. The military has always been one of the most egalitarian because it relies entirely on voluntary soldiers for this purpose. It's a good thing we are not a Spartan militaristic society. And it's a good thing the military amicus brief the the decision of the SCOTUS. [/quote] ...it's a good thing the military amicus brief is [i]not[/i][b] the decision of the SCOTUS. That's what the 8 current and 1 soon-to-be SCOTUS justices are for. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics