Reply to The Role of Anti-Clinton FBI Agents

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "The Role of Anti-Clinton FBI Agents"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous]Theres plenty of dirt around. Probably enough to cover everyone.  But as an American the “We’ll stop it” text should give us all chills.[/quote]

Chills or not, actions are more important than words. Nothing about the Trump investigation was leaked or officially revealed before the election. If anyone was interested in stopping Trump, simply confirming the investigation to Harry Reid would have been enough. [b]But, everyone in the FBI acted to protect Trump[/b]. On the other hand, NYC office FBI agents leaked information about Weiner's laptop forcing Comey to disclose its existence to Congress which led to the information being made public. [b]The fact that rogue FBI agents had a direct affect in hurting Clinton[/b] during the campaign should give you far more chills than a simple text. 
[/quote]

I do wonder what publications you read/follow to come to these conclusions...[/quote]

DP, for me, primary sources and a variety of what I consider to be real news sources, like Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, the Economist and other European outlets. But I agree with Jeff on this based on what I have read and from friends and contacts whom I consider to be reliable.[/quote]

Can you lead me to those stories? I'm curious. I've read the report and am stunned that anyone would come to this conclusion without some severe dizziness. [/quote]

I have posted, probably more than a hundred in different threads in this forum. Sorry, I cannot take the time to recreate it all.

[/quote]

Fair enough. I've found a few on my own and all of them seem to ignore the fact that the FBI was sitting on information it had re: laptop/Weiner, and are complaining instead that someone 'told on them'.  This is like someone cheating on their wife and then getting pissed off when someone sees them out with their affair partner, and tells the person's spouse. The focus is then on the person who told about the injustice, not the injustice itself.

Perhaps the upper personnel of the FBI should have acted within the law to begin with?

It was VERY clear to those of us paying attention that something was VERY corrupt in Clintonland. [/quote]

I am the PP from above and for context, while Trump has pushed me to the left, I was moderate and was never a Clinton fan - either of them.

Here is the problem. The FBI had protocols in place that should have precluded what is now known as the Comey letter that was ultimately made public by Chaffetz. Were there things that the FBI did wrong with respect to Hillary? Absolutely. But they were bound, and Comey was pressured to take an action that IMO materially impacted the voter perceptions and ultimately the election. It is but one small piece in what is clearly a coordinated effort, along with all of the social media stuff, all of the Russia stuff etc. Because of the status of the Russia investigation at that time, there was no way it could have been disclosed, unless it was at the highest levels of our country. Since McConnell refused a direct request despite having been briefed fully, to make a bi-partisan statement with Obama, I lay some of this at his feet.

Comey, IMO was fully boxed because he was forced to send the letter (released by Chaffetz) as a result of pressure actions taken in the NY FBI Office. Actions, I should add, that Nunes, Giuliani, Prince, Stone and others were fully briefed on, and were part of. As such, this was clearly a coordinated effort and the right wing media drum banging on it was apparent at the time and is more apparent today.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics