Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)
Reply to "Let’s Talk APS High Schools: 4th one or no?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If we don’t do this all three high schools better get ready for 3000 kids and trailers. All the N Arlington elementary boosters are complaining they the need seats... well guess what those elementary kids will be in HS at WL AND Yorktown in ten plus years! [/quote] Not all of them will be 3000 and trailers, Yorktown can’t take any trailers. So it’ll be roughly 2000 at Yorktown and 3,500 at W-L and Wakefield with a couple dozen trailers each. At least W-L can put its trailers where they’re accessible to the main building, Wakefield will basically have to create an upper school and an lower school, with one of them in a trailer village across the campus past all the fields.[/quote] Yorktown can’t cap enrollment. That’s not how it works. Sorry, but they have to take the students in their boundaries. Which will rise as the other schools become too crowded. No one gets off the hook.[/quote] And when they realize they are coming to a point where they literally cannot put all of the Yorktown students in seats, they will do a boundary re-drawing looking at trailer capacity for each school. Max seats for Yorktown post-expansion will be around 2,100; W-L is 2,964; Wakefield is 3,079. Where do you think they're going to shift planning units?[/quote] = one Langley and two TC Williams. Well done, “progressive” clowns.[/quote] It doesn't have to be that way. But for it to be different, the people with the most to lose have to stop expecting something they've already been told can't happen and instead focus on what the best solution real-world solution. I can absolutely see it happening that families outside the Yorktown zone will fight a fourth comprehensive high school on the grounds that APS could balance enrollment across all three high schools if they just create a tent community on the sidwalks around Yorktown, and then will find themselves shocked and screaming racism/elitism when the SB gives up fighting them, doesn't create a fourth high school, and instead uses utility relocatables to create a cafeteria and gymnasium on the western side of the Wakefield parcel to go with 30 relocatable classrooms, effectively creating a second school on the site. If that's not what people want, then you need to focus on getting a fourth high school rather than talking about whether the parking lots around Yorktown could be terraformed to create an acceptable grade for trailers (because that's a big part of the problem with the idea of putting trailers on the parking lot, Yorktown is on a hillside and the grade makes much of the site unusable for trailers).[/quote] Yes, W-L, be careful what you wish for. You SHOULD be supportive of a full 4th neighborhood high school at the CC. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics