Reply to Michael Cohen and related issues Master Thread

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Michael Cohen and related issues Master Thread"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]As you folks wet your pants with this “revelation,” the rest of us will wait for the evidence or proof that Hannity’s connection to Cohen is anything nefarious or unethical.  He has just stated on his radio show that he has never had him on retainer, he never represented Hannity in any court filings, and any dealings he had with him did not involve a third party.

I think this will go down as another instance of news that gets liberals all worked up in a hot mess, but turns out to be a nothing burger.  [/quote]

It’s very odd that Cohen didn’t want to reveal that hannity is his client.  If it was, for example, that hannity was seeking legal advice about purchasing an apartment in nyc that hardly seems worth invoking the judge’s ire with a refusal to name hannity as the client.  Generally, the identity of one’s counsel is not a big deal.  So, then we have to ask, why the desperate desire to conceal the relationship.

And, as others have said, if hannity is saying that Cohen is not his attorney, then no privilege attaches. [/quote]

What I heard is that Hannity requested his name not be disclosed.  Why, you ask?  Look at the $hit storm going on with liberals.  I wouldn’t want that either.  [/quote]

if it was just occasional legal advice, they would have said so.  Nothing wrong with that and the taint team will remove ut.  But they wanted to  keep it secret because there is something illegal or embarrassing in the files.  Most likely illegal, because if it were just embarrassing legal info, it would still be privileged.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics