Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)
Reply to "No separate AAP student track in FCPS high schools, right?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] [b]It can't be the curriculum for everyone.[/b] Have you not heard about the achievement gap? Or the high level of ESOL students in the area? There is also growing concern at the elementary level already that academics are moving too fast for their kids. Not everyone wants to devote the time to be "above grade level" or has the ability to be "above grade level" in school. Those kids that want to learn more and can handle it should have the opportunity. And AAP can be harder than general ed for some students. That's a ridiculous statement to say they are completely the same. They are not. [b]Perhaps more students can handle the AAP curriculum than are offered it, however this argument is about making that group smaller, not larger.[/b][/quote] I agree that it can't be the curriculum for everyone. It can, however, be a curriculum offered to the most advanced classes at the local school. Nothing about the curriculum requires bussing to a separate school and a self-contained classroom [i]for all subjects[/i]. Regarding the second bolded point, I feel like AAP needs to be both larger and smaller. The current AAP curriculum isn't very advanced, and many kids are excluded who would be more than capable of handling it. Those kids should be allowed the opportunity to do so. At the same time, AAP has been watered down by so much over-inclusion that the kids at the top are poorly served by the current model. I'd be thrilled if FCPS reverted to the GT system of the past (including at most 5% of the kids), but then offered the AAP curriculum on an open-enrollment basis at all local schools. [/quote] Open enrollment advanced classes in elementary school would not be advanced. They would be slowed down for all the children of parents who want the "advanced" label for social reasons.[/quote] This is how AAP currently is, what with all the appeals from parents desperate to get their average kids in. It's why AAP is no longer a "gifted" program, as it was in the 80s and 90s. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics