Reply to AAP appeal declined

Forum Index » Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)

Reply to "AAP appeal declined "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]
If FCPS has an issue with a specific tester, they should state it publicly.  People ask for WISC recommendations on this board and people have recommended this tester multiple times.  The parent then sees that the tester meets the requirements specified by FCPS and uses the tester.  Why should the parent/child be penalized for not knowing some secret (if that's the case) FCPS bias against the tester? It would be pretty easy for them to say all testing must be done through GMU.  Until then, they shouldn't penalize people for not knowing who is or isn't viewed in a negative light.  [/quote]

Several years ago FCPS met with the Northern Virginia Association of Clinical Psychologists, specifically to reiterate the need for integrity of testing.

http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/30/558604.page#8981898

I am not a lawyer, but I would guess "If FCPS has an issue with a specific tester, they should state it publicly" would result in a lawsuit. So they opted to go the professional association path to remind all about integrity of testing.

(And no, I do not know the name of the psychologist that showed up when FCPS AAP staff kept a tally of the WISC results and the name of the psychologist.)

As a poster on the old(er) thread noted -- there was at least one tester who frequently did WISC testing. Just because someone is frequently used does not mean their testing lacks integrity.

http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/45/558604.page#8983582
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics