Reply to Obama Admin under pressure to provide "hacking" proof

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Obama Admin under pressure to provide "hacking" proof"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It's [b]also known [/b]that the RNC was hacked, it's [b]also known [/b]that the RNC was engaging in underhanded tactics like DWS was doing with Clinton vs. Sanders yet it was only the DNC emails that were leaked to Wikileaks by the hackers.  Clearly the hackers were favoring one party over the other with the intent to manipulate the outcome.[/quote]

Priebus has said that there was an attempt at a hack--but it was unsuccessful.  Where is your proof that the RNC was hacked?

Seriously?  I don't think it is any secret that the GOP establishment was not in favor of Trump, but when the voters selected him, they supported the chosen candidate.  DNC actively worked against Sanders.  I suspect that if RNC emails had been hacked that is what you would find.  But, there is a difference between not being in favor of and actively working against.

And, what does "also known" mean?[/quote]

The IC and House Homeland Security Committee said the RNC was hacked.  The claim is that they didn't get anything but the fact is we don't really know what they did or didn't get from the RNC.

As for Priebus, he worked against some of the Republican candidates during the Primaries and that ended up benefiting Trump and when Trump began to emerge, Priebus went all in.  It's self-evident from the fact that Trump is now rewarding Priebus with the Chief of Staff position that Priebus helped him.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics