Reply to MoCo term limits- convince me

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "MoCo term limits- convince me"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]I'm against it and I work closely with people who will be affected, but I'm non partisan if that makes sense. So take my opinion in context.

I see it as a limit on a voter's ability to choose.   At the local level, it gives staff like me more power because new politicians don't have much subject matter expertise.  I do. But you can't fire me.  You can "fire" politicians by not voting. And apparently studies show term limits make politicians rely on lobbyists more, again for the expertise.

And I have amazing respect for a few Councilmembers, who I don't want to leave, because they are truly good for the county.  They learn the issues, understand the broader policy implications, and know how to compromise.

Practically speaking, 4 of 9 will soon leave office to run for County Executive.  So you are cleaning house anyway.  Maybe 5. And if that one leaves I'll cry.

Objectively, limiting Council to 3 terms is better than 2.

I have less problem limiting the Executive to three terms.  I'd be fine with two like we have for governor and president. Most of the heavy lifting is done in Council. They are the final appropriation authority.

You might look harder at public campaign financing. Might help elect some at/large members from upcounty.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics