Reply to Wapo editor Bob Woodward admitted the Clinton Foundation is corrupt

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Wapo editor Bob Woodward admitted the Clinton Foundation is corrupt"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Glad to hear someone finally stating the truth. 
Obama’s DOJ has really worked overtime to protect Hillary.  
If this were a Republican nominee that accepted 12 million from Morocco, there would already be an investigation open.  [/quote]

I find it hilarious that (a) dems will still vote for her, despite her taking money from countries with a horrible reputation of abusing women and (b) vote for her because she's a woman due to some sense of feminist solidarity.

The irony![/quote]

Why are you playing the gender card?[/quote]

Because that's the claimed reason for a lot of women voting for Clinton. Something along the lines of "it's time we had a woman..."  They call it "historic", for no other reason than Hillary gender-identifying as a woman. [/quote]

:roll: 
You're so totally right. Thank you for mansplaining that. Now I know, we dum wimmens shouldn't have noticed that Washington through Obama were men, as were almost all of everyone else and we certainly weren't totally excluded from voting till after the turn of the century and there's absolutely nothing historic about Hillary about to kick Donald's ass. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics