Reply to So hurricane Matthew and the election

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "So hurricane Matthew and the election"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It favors Clinton.  Because Obama has spent eight years working on disaster preparedness, and as a result this administration has done a great job in disaster response.[/quote]

The administration did not fair so well in their recent disasters.[/quote]
The response to Katrina was certainly the gold standard.  :roll: [/quote]
A massive amount of the failure during Katrina however fell on those in power in Louisiana. Has always been on the shoulders of local and state until the damage is done. What followed wasn't unusual in response either. BTDT more than once. Following there was other failures, no doubt, but once you screw up what happens before and during anything that follows is magnified.

[b]BTW, why is NOLA the standard? [/b]The destruction along the Mississippi coast was far more extensive. What was the difference? The citizens and their elected officials weren't inept or corrupt.[/quote]

New Orleans is a US treasure, for one thing, and a center of population. It's not like the Mississippi gulf coast is unsettled, but it's also not as dense as NO and surrounding environs.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics