Reply to Hillary to "Speak Directly to White People"!

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Hillary to "Speak Directly to White People"!"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]There was another killing of an unarmed black man by a white cop last night. In response, there was a riot in which blacks attacked cops and of course committed a lot of destruction. Although it doesn't look good for the officer, the facts are not yet in.  And yet Hillary, in an effort to gain black support, has immediately condemned police specifically and "white people" as a whole (saying "we are better than this") and immediately sided with the black victim. She did not condemn the violence that ensured, nor the community's illegal actions in taking judgment into their own hands,

Does anyone other than me see the double standard here? Look how careful Hillary (and the other liberals) were not to rush to judgment against the Islamic terrorist, saying we don't have all the facts - yet when it's a white police officer involved, she immediately condemns all police and white people - whom she said she "can speak directly to" (!) before any investigation has occurred.

Instead, she should have said that although it doesn't look good for the cop, we have no facts and must not rush to judgment AND criticize the violence the erupted in the black community as a result. She is acting just like Obama - jumping to defend the black guy if a white guy is involved - without knowing anything about the incident. But at least Obama said the ensuing violence isn't the answer. Hillary is so desperate for the black vote that she's afraid to criticize their own unacceptable behavior.[/quote]

You do not get it and will never get it. Another cop kill's a black person and you think she should not spoken? She was not rushing to judgement. This is unacceptable behavior of the cop. Whether the black person was guilty or innocent, cops do not have the right to kill. Even if it is a terrorist, cops do not have right to kill, unless it is to protect others or self defense.

How do you compare her not "rushing to judgement" about whether an event is bombing or something else; someone motivated by extremism or personal grievance; connected or unconnected etc to denouncing a cop killing another black?

[/quote]
No. She was correct to have spoken. But what she said was wrong. Why is she condemning all police and all white people - especially when we are repeatedly admonished not to harbor ill will toward Muslims in general because of a few bad apples? I really resent when she said "I can speak directly to white people" - as if we all need a scolding. Can you imagine if she said, following the terrorist attack, that "Muslims are better than this" and that she "will speak directly to Muslims"? It's the double standard.[/quote]

Where did she condemn all white people? She said white people are better than to judge black people as criminals all the time. What's wrong with that? If you don't judge blacks as criminals then you are not one of the white people she is taking to.[/quote]
And there goes the snide put-down from the liberal....[/quote]

And there comes the denial and smugness from the uppity republican when black lives are lost regularly for no reason. How many innocent whites are killed every year by cops? [/quote]
And there goes the remark about uppity Republicans, along with the charges of racism. The person upthread just pointed out that nearly 75% of the victims are WHITE. [/quote]

Where did you get the 75% , show some credible proof that 75% of innocent people shot by cops are white men. You know that is such a lie if you can't show proof. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics