Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Paul Manafort's lucrative Russian connections"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Actually...according to cables released by wikileaks, he was a source for US information https://mobile.twitter.com/wikileaks/status/760111699936550912 He wasn't some Russian spy, he was the US embassies source in the Ukraine. [/quote] This of course assumes Wikileaks is a fully honest broker themselves. [/quote] They can't be any less trusted than the NY Times at this point. [/quote] The NY Times doesn't hack emails. Wikileaks sole purpose is to do exactly that. Say what you will about the Times, they are still much more reliable than Wikileaks.[/quote] The NY times based a hot piece off a pice of paper that was handwritten. No forensic evidence found for the transactions other than conjecture. More to the point, wikileaks doesn't hack, they just publish. It shows how uninformed you are. The state dept cables are there to read and it shows Manafort was our source being utilized by the State Dept.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics