Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "That Brock Allen Turner is a dirtbag"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote]Could someone who is familiar with sentencing explain to me the process? Is a probation officer interview of the victim normal, if so how can the one in this case have been deemed acceptable, and is this interview the judge's primary deciding factor for sentencing? Either I'm missing something, or this went terribly wrong. Once a sentence is decided, can it be changed? [/quote] It varies by state. I'm not familiar with California's process, but based on the federal process, a probation office interview of the victim is not unusual. Typically it would be optional for the victim; the victim can decline. I don't know the facts of the case or what happened in this interview. But the probation/presentence report process exists to inform the judge; it does not bind the judge. The problem here sounds like the judge, not the process. In the federal system, once sentence is pronounced, it cannot be changed, unless appealed and overturned (or commuted by the executive). Again, I don't know about California. Some states have processes whereby a sentence can be reduced by the judge after imposition. I highly doubt any state has a process whereby it can be increased. (I have doubts whether that would be constitutional.) [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics