Reply to Oligarchy

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Oligarchy"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Whatever political leanings OP has, I agree with the general point. It does seem that between the Bushes and the Clintons, we have had a political dynasty for most of the last 30+ years.

Bushes and Clintons (and Kennedys and Romneys to a degree) have had a place in every government level, and it just seems icky and un-American to concentrate power in the same few names over and over again.
[/quote]

The sky is not falling.  The voters have the opportunity to select the person the feel is most qualified.  Service as a Governor or US Senator is practically a prerequisite to serving as President and being in a position to accomplish anything of import.  I don't view having been twice-elected as a US Senator and serving for eight years and then serving as Secretary of State for four years as a disqualifying factor simply because her spouse served as President more than a decade and a half in the past.  Moreover, Hillary not free to pushes her own policies at Stare and one just 1 percent of the collective vote in the Senate.  She will be elected, or not, as the case may be, on her own merits, as was Dubya, for better or worse.  Just take a look at Jeb!, who was arguably the heir apparent to what you consider the Bush dynasty.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics