Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Kids With Special Needs and Disabilities
Reply to "Do kids ever outgrow the need for ADHD medication?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I am always surprised how little research people do on this. The evidence is that ADHD meds do not improve school performance in the long term. http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887323368704578593660384362292[/quote] I can't read that particular article since I don't subscribe to WSJ, but I have read other articles published around the same time, including several that quoted/cited the WSJ article. From what I've read, the evidence on impact on grades/academic performance is much more mixed than you're presenting it, with some studies finding an improvement in long-term performance. Also, some of the studies referenced as supporting the notion that medication doesn't help are from the 70s, back when both understand of ADHD and available medication options were very different than they are today, reducing the relevance of that research to modern treatment. Finally, as someone else said, treatment of ADHD is about so much more than just grades; to suggest otherwise is deeply ignorant.[/quote] Pp you are correct: the effects observed are extremely mixed depending on study population and design. And really, none have accomplished what we all really want to know as they do a poor job at systematically following families over time and collecting data in a standardized way during that process. There is a preschool one from Hopkins that did a slightly better job at this, but they ironically even seemed to miss discussing one of the main messages from their own data... At the end of their follow up time, medicated ADHD kids still lagged behind kids without ADHD in the ADHD severity scale and other measures they used. However, the medicated kids also showed a major increase in gains when they started meds relative to non ADHD kids, and they maintained those gains over time! So while they still were maybe lower than non ADHD kids at the end (which is what the authors focused on), these kids significantly closed the gap once they started meds. The problem is many of the people conducting these studies aren't that savvy with methodology and so they rely on biostatisticians for help who are less aware of the biological mechanisms and relevant nuances of the data. And then some reporter from a newspaper decides to play scientist and make wide sweeping statements that even they can't possibly understand the origins of.[/quote] Well, this is what the Hopkins press release form 2013 has to say about the study: " The study shows that nearly 90 percent of the 186 youngsters followed continued to struggle with ADHD symptoms six years after diagnosis. [b]Children taking ADHD medication had just as severe symptoms as those who were medication-free, the study found[/b]." http://www.hopkinschildrens.org/ADHD-Symptoms-Persist-for-Most-Young-Children-Despite-Treatment.aspx I am sure that ADHD meds make a difference for some kids -- but the fact is that you should understand the literature and have a doctor who is willing to discuss all these questions with you in detail. The science is far from clear here. [/quote] Exactly. Read the actual paper and data. Their data show that those kids who were medicated showed a big improvement that was sustained. Kids who opt to stay on meds are likely more severe than families who choose to not medicate or discontinue.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics