Reply to Cracking the code—why labels don’t matter so don’t drive yourself crazy

Forum Index » Kids With Special Needs and Disabilities

Reply to "Cracking the code—why labels don’t matter so don’t drive yourself crazy"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]

OP, what a crock of lies you are spreading. As someone who had to fight tooth and nail to keep a false ASD  diagnosis off my kid, I know it makes a huge difference if you are incorrectly labeled. I've seen it firshand.

Parents should ALWAYS insist on accurate labels, even if lazy, incompetent school personnel try to tell you otherwise.  I've gotten every service we've needed AND forced them to use the correct label.

[/quote]

You didn't actually read any of the original post.  A medical diagnosis ISN'T the same thing as a designation to receive IEP services.  It's not a crock of lies; it's the law.  You can receive an IEP for only the following:

• autism;
• deaf-blindness;
• deafness;
• emotional disturbance;
• hearing impairment;
• intellectual disability;
• multiple disabilities;
• orthopedic impairment;
• other health impairment;
• specific learning disability;
• speech or language impairment;
• traumatic brain injury; or
• visual impairment (including blindness).

So your child may not have autism, but unless the school can attribute one of the above 13 potential diagnoses, he won't get an IEP either.  That is my point.  Until the law changes and has more inclusive language, the "label" the school uses may not be accurate but will get you accommodations and services.

But honestly, PP if you've been fighting tooth and nail to keep off an ASD diagnosis from your child, my guess is you are fighting the wrong battle.
[/quote]

Oh no, I read your whole post the first time.

You left out Early Childhood Developmental Delay. In my state you can be under that until you are 7 years old. At 7, my son was switched to Language Impairment. Specific Learning Disability also would have worked.

I well know a medical diagnosis isn't the same as an educational label. I had multiple medical assessments of my child saying he was not autistic, but instead severely language impaired, with processing issues and learning disabilities. But school districts do whatever is easiest for them. So if they have invested their resources in an ASD program, that's where they want to throw as many kids as possible.  Very few outsiders or even parents understand the difference between school labeling and medical diagnosis, though. Our school district outsources a lot of services, so to have an incorrect autism label leads to a whole lot of wasted, unhelpful therapies and approaches.

My school district personnel was also under the false assumption that Language Impairment would only get you speech therapy.  They were wrong, of course; any tick of any of the categories gets you ALL the services a child needs to access the curriculum. It took a parent with guts like me to stand up to them for them to realize they weren't following the law.

I've met only one parent who was happy they accepted an ASD label for their language-impaired child. The rest curse the day they let themselves be talked into it by the schools, or even doctors who were only trying to "help" because the inflated diagnosis brought more services.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics