Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Religion
Reply to "Supreme Court decision in favor of muslim woman vs. abercrombie"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I don't agree with this ruling. The company has a "look" they want (which I also don't agree with) and they should have the ability to hire people who conform to their brand. Same with Hooters hiring hot girls. It's no different to me than actors/actresses who have a look to play a part. [/quote] It's the religion thing - if Hooters refused to hire women of a certain religion, they'd be in trouble too.[/quote] No. Abercrombie doesn't care what religion you are, just didn't want the scarf. Even though the scarf is tied to a religion, they aren't the same. All Muslims don't wear head scarfs and Abercrombie has hired Muslims who don't wear scarves. [/quote] This. It's about the scarf, not the religion.[/quote] You are missing the point. Abercrombie did not want to accept a religious practice. A person who is Muslim but doesn't act or dress like one is acceptable to them. A person who dresses like a Muslim is unacceptable to them. It means they discriminated religious practice.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics