Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Interesting extracts from round 1 data"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It didn't. You accidentally posted it on the thread about auctions.[/quote] Thanks, I'm an idiot... Although a very confused idiot, because I haven't even read that thread? Oh well. Meant to post: I think it's interesting how many of the schools at the very top are Capitol Hill schools. Suggests there is a lot more local need for PK3 spots not being met. I'm also curious how many of these parents will lottery for Miner, which didn't fill for PK3 but has a WL for PK4, in R2. I think Miner may finally start improving if Hill families start to fill it simply b/c they have no other local options (it's how Maury drastically improved quickly 5-10 years ago).[/quote] Miner has a cohort of at least 21 "Hill" families (people IB and waitlisted at Peabody, Brent and Maury) who were matched and are considering attending. Should be a good group. If I was shut out of Round 1 I would definitely put it as a Round 2 choice. [/quote] This is the problem in a nutshell. While Miner is perfectly fine for ECE, this cohort will be headed back to Peabody, Brent and Maury after two years. When and how does the pattern get changed? Will guaranteed IB admission for PK at Title I schools accomplish this? [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics