Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Constructive ways to decrease Janney class size"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Rezone the Turtle Park area to Hearst. Simple as that. The walking distance from there to Hearst is only slightly longer than to Janney so it's not like you are taking kids from 3 blocks away. And you still keep Deal.[/quote] +1 Change the boundaries or stop complaining.[/quote] The proposed boundary changes would not have change the numbers much, and for kindergarten, it would not have impacted the numbers at all, as none of the current kindergarteners were among the very few families who would have been effected by the proposed change. So the current situation with the K classes has nothing to do with the communities rejection of the proposal to oust a few families from the school based on location. OP started this thread looking for constructive comments. A number of posters have provided really thoughtful replies, but the ones who keep saying that Janney community needs to live with its decision to reject the recent boundary proposals is not being constructive and also demonstrates a lack of understanding as to how minimal those proposed changes were. [/quote] Sorry typed too quickly: "community's" not "communities."[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics