Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Entitled EOTP parents"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It does not seem entitled to ask for a school to have a no movies/screen time policy for early childhood, in both the regular program and the after care. Screen time for these grades just means that the school is being lazy.[/quote] It does not seem entitled to you to tell people that they are lazy, because they are not doing their job in exactly the manner of which you approve? I don't care about one hour a week. I would care if it was every day, but I really do not think that one hour a week is a big deal. If that makes me "not an entitled EOTP gentrifier", I'm fine with that.[/quote] I wouldn't make a big deal about one hour a week. But there are different ways to do a job, there is cultural difference, and then there is laziness. Too much TV is laziness. Is there any acceptable way to call out laziness without being accused of entitlement?[/quote] Yes. It begins with not suggesting that the way that someone is doing something is "lazy" or "against our values" when it is simply a policy you disagree with and you do not actually speak for the entire group.[/quote] How does someone saying that screen time in school is lazy mean that they are speaking for a whole group? Can't they just speak for themselves?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics