Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Fox News Withdraws Claims of "No-Go Zones""
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous]This is such an interesting subject, because I don't believe there needed to be an apology, except to explain what was meant. There are indeed areas that could be considered 'no go zones', i.e. places that are primarily X or Y and if you are Z, it's bad news to go there. Cabrini Green would be an excellent example. There are indeed primarily radicalized areas where you would not want to go. It's like the term "Death Panels". If the government, an insurance company, whatever decides they will not pay for a treatment, and you can't afford it, indeed that's a death panel. When Emanuel talks of withholding care for the aging after a certain point, he is talking about a death panel. You might not like the terms being used, but it's always best to look beyond those terms and see if the actions are consistent with how the term is defined.[/quote] When Fox used the term "no-go zones", the network was not referring to Cabrini Green. They explicitly said that sharia was applied in those zones. No such place has been demonstrated to actually exist. The issue is not that Fox apologized, but that the network admitted that it had been wrong. You should take them at their word. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics