Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Why haven't alleged UVA rapists been identified?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]How can they possibly identify the alleged rapists when there is no possible way to prosecute them? Or prove their guilt or innocence? The story was more about the cover up aspects of UVAs handling of rape in general than about this specific incident. Have you never heard of libel laws?[/quote] That's a revisionist take on what the story was about. Why couldn't there be a prosecution if there were an investigation and prosecutors obtained testimony from Jackie and cooperating witnesses (some of whom might receive immunity or a reduced sentence in exchange for cooperating)? There are murder trials years after the crime where a body is never recovered. In addition, truth is a defense to a defamation claim, so there should be no liability attached to identifying the alleged attackers and leaving it up to criminal authorities to decide whether to press rape charges. Surely Rolling Stone and any number of support groups would gladly pay any legal fees that Jackie, the author of the RS piece and RS might incur if charged with libel or slander. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics