Reply to What is your definition of Middle class, upper middle class and lower middle class

Forum Index » Money and Finances

Reply to "What is your definition of Middle class, upper middle class and lower middle class"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]Oh my gawd, how did I miss this gem of a post...

[quote=Anonymous]The definition of social class by money and a diploma conveys the hollow nature of society in this country.[/quote]

Money is a proxy for the amount of contribution that a person makes to society. While acknowledging outliers and exceptions, people who contribute more in general get more money. The market based economy of the US is the best manifestation of this principle in the world. One notable exception is when a person is a student. But in this situation, a diploma is recognition of a person's educational achievements. Therefore, money and diploma are very real and substantial indications of a person's achievements, the exact opposite of hollow.

[quote=Anonymous]Integrity, character, the cultivation of others and self meant something, but there is a structural rot in modern society.[/quote]

So how do you assess that a person practices integrity, character and "cultivation of others" in their every day life? Secondly, how are these more important than a persons contribution to society in terms of material contribution and advancement of knowledge?  While I am not arguing that integrity/character/charity are not important, they are certainly not more important, and definitely not the opposites of money and knowledge.

[quote=Anonymous]
It is akin to the institutional corruption that Larry Lessig talks about lately.  In pursuing good and bad, people ignore institutional ethics and design.  One that values materialism, consumerism and the vapid idea that selfishness leads to a greater good.[/quote]

Pursuing good leads to pursuit of ethics and design. You have China as a shining example of this: introduction of free market elements have led to more pursuits of good, which has directly led to increasing demands people have on the ethics of their government, and regulations to improve their environment. The pursuit of ideals for ideals' sake is what led that country astray under communism. Ideals without basis in reality or natural human nature is dangerous. 
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics