Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Money and Finances
Reply to "As an advisor, into the shark tank..."
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=OTAlexFA][quote=Anonymous]Why don't I just put my money in index funds rather than you? Will your fee + the returns outperform index funds + fees?[/quote] This one feels like a trap. :) In a bull market? Maybe not. Index funds are outstanding when everyone is making money. However, are you going to tactically manage those passive funds? If not, you can guess what happens when the market "corrects" (a term I don't like). You'll get virtually 100% of the market growth now and then virtually 100% of the downcapture, as well. There's no hedge. As most of us know from math, if you lose 20%, it takes 25% of gains to get back to even. Index funds are very popular, particularly on DCUM, I've seen. I like them. I use them. The question is, does it fit your strategy? What's your time horizon? What's your goal? Index funds are great; they just aren't a cure-all.[/quote] NP here. This answer is ridiculous. Index funds get you market average returns for nominal fees. They do that in bull and bear markets. Active management only guarantees higher fees. It's possible that active management will outperform or underperform in a bull market. It's also possible that active management will outperform or underperform in a bear market. There is nothing magical about a "hedge" that lessens the amount of your bear downcapture in a way that more than offsets the drag you feel during the bull run where you are underperforming due to holding that same hedge. There are plenty of active managers who have overweighted cash the last 5 years as a "tactical" strategy for a correction that never happened - active managers have no magic crystal ball to know when the next correction will occur. Your answer is just the marketing speak that active managers use to draw you away from the fact that active management, over the long run (i.e., multiple market cycles) is statistically likely to underperform the market as a whole, as it's very difficult to overcome the headwind of significant fees over the long run. I personally use both active and passive strategies, but the simplistic notion that active management outperforms during bear cycles is disingenuous.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics