Reply to Highly UNscientific proof that the common lottery worked

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "Highly UNscientific proof that the common lottery worked"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote]

I was matched with my #2 school and have made peace with that choice. To me it seems to have worked very well, because I am waitlisted in the top ten at my #1 choice, and have not yet received a call asking if I want that spot. This means that those who matched truly wanted those spots, and weren't just grabbing as many spots as they could.  [/quote]

yes, it worked quite well for you. I think there's a sense of inherent unfairness from people who got low #s--here you got into #2, with a shot at #1, where people on the bottom didn't even get into #12, or near it on a waitlist. The top lottery winners have a very good chance of getting into their top schools, but those at the bottom have a poor shot of getting into their last choice. The lottery works well now, in terms of waitlsits and efficiency,  but for the people who had poor luck, it sucks. You only have one number and if its bad, well, too bad for you. Under the old, chaotic system, you had 12-15 chances of drawing a decent number. I say this as someone who already has a slot from last year. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics