Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "The SAT Tutor To The Rich"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote]The kids who tend to do very well on SAT without studying tend to also do very well in non-SAT related things.[/quote] This can also cut against students with very high SAT scores, but less than perfect gpa, because the less-than-perfect gpa may be asignal that the very bright student did not work hard, or turn in assignments, etc. Having a gpa that matches the SAT score is probably better than having a super-high SAT score but a 3.7 gpa. [/quote] This is such a gross distortion of reality. What a pretentious and presumptuous person you are. You don't think a 3.7 is a high GPA? [/quote] S/He specifically said super-high SAT. If a kid has a 2250+ SAT (which is, btw, beyond 99th percentile), then yes, a 3.7 GPA is a little on the low side. That implies, assuming nothing lower than a B and 3 years of 2 semesters of 7 classes, 12-13 Bs. That's a lot of Bs for a kid who beat out almost everyone else who took the SAT. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
