Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "In Case You're Wondering What Crazy Benghazi Lady Is On About...But Were Afraid To Ask"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous]So on Sept 12 Obama stated it was a terrorist attack. Why perpetuate the video scam then?[/quote] I swear to God the conservatives on this site are incapable of reading. The talking points that originated with the CIA stated that the attack grew out of a demonstration that was inspired by demonstrations in Cairo that were provoked by the video. The final version of the talking points changed "terrorists" in the original version to "extremists". Therefore, the Administration's story was that there was a demonstration inspired by the video from which grew an "act of terror" committed by "extremists". It was not until later that the Administration realized that there had been no demonstration and therefore, the video played no role. As for the "respectable conservative" above, you may be respectable, but you certainly are not literate. Please have your message translated to English and then I will respond. [/quote] From the ABC News exclusive: ABC News has obtained 12 different versions of the talking points that show they were extensively edited as they evolved from the drafts first written entirely by the CIA to the final version distributed to Congress and to U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice [b]before she appeared on five talk shows the Sunday after that attack.[/b] [/quote] I am going to have to drop out of these discussions because you conservatives cannot retain information. In fact, you don't even appear to read my responses. Do you realize that I have linked at least five times to the talking points drafts? The link I have been providing goes to the document referenced by the article that you are quoting. The link is actually in that article! So, you are now quoting from an article that references a document to which I have been posting links for days. I don't know what you think you are proving. I am obviously aware of the editing of the talking points. Ultimately, the editing shows that specific mentions of terrorism were removed and replaced by "extremists". That's the entire scandal you have here. Now, you and Sunshine Boy can just keep repeating things to each other. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics