Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "New Yorker article about Andrew Tate"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Social media platforms and news outlets need to be held accountable and be forced to ban people like Tate. Look, I know there's freedom of the press and all. But there are limits on that - the press cannot commit crimes while gathering news, publish false statements, incite lawless action, violate copyright law, etc. If a news channel started saying hey, serial killers are great and more people should become serial killers, and interviewing serial killers, it would be shut down for criminal solicitation. Same thing here. At the very least, social media platforms need to be more heavily regulated. Ragebait like Tate gets promoted because it keeps people on the platforms longer. There needs to be heavier regulations. Which absolutely can be done; I have a friend who does OF and her face has been banned from multiple platforms, so she can't even start new accounts. If we can ban women for being too sexual, we can ban men for being hateful.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
