Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Lacrosse
Reply to "5 in 5 rule"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Ugh I don’t understand how it is crushing for 27s-29s or make getting recruited out of high school harder. Can someone explain it for me again in easy to understand terms? Thank you![/quote] I realize the math is hard for some. Instead of 38 player roster cap/4 years of eligibility or 9.5 player slots per class, you have a 38 player roster cap/5 years of eligibility, or 7.6 player slots per class. This is 2 fewer recruits per class per school. Making matters worse, for the first few years, with larger average classes already on board, if players elect to stay for their 5th year, the total recruiting need will be even smaller. So you could see some programs, especially top programs that have the ability to bring in top transfers, recruiting only 2-4 players per class, before the compression balances out. The same phenomenon happened with COVID, but was mitigated somewhat as there were no roster limits. Taken together, these two changes could make it very tough for 27s through 30s. Not ideal for those with aspiring college players in those classes--especially if they have ambition to play for a top 40 program. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics