Reply to Michael Jackson: Was he Innocent?

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Michael Jackson: Was he Innocent?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Seriously?  You must not have read much about the allegations.  A kid was able to draw a picture of the Vitilago markings on his penis.  I don’t think he was evil but mentally ill.  He was abused physically, mentally and sexually as a child and as a result didn’t know what being normal is.[/quote]

This.  I think he was seriously mentally ill.  He may not have intended to harm children, but he did.  He was not innocent.  I also think the parents of those kids were nothing short of opportunistic star effers by proxy.  They were blinded by the money and access and perks of having “chosen” children.  [/quote]

NP. Agree with both these posters.

The PR machine seems to be working overtime to clear his name and make $$$.[/quote]
Idk that there’s a PR machine. He was found innocent so I think a lot of people just assume he was innocent rather than lack of evidence to prove guilt.

That being said the movie is just one big money making scheme for his family. Really? His 30yo nephew (who is far better looking than he ever was) who has never acted is the lead and all of his siblings just decided to take up movie producing in their 70s? lol. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics