Reply to VA SCOTUS oral arguments

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "VA SCOTUS oral arguments"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]There’s something really weird about demanding disenfranchisement and invalidating the results of a literal referendum, which is the purest form of democracy, while arguing that the results disenfranchise people.

This was a majority win for “yes.” I don’t see how the court can not abide by the will of the people here.[/quote]

If the process was unconstitutional, they have to overturn.  
Then there is the issue of the referendum question itself…..

[twitter]https://x.com/va_gop/status/2049654130713719251?s=46&t=R0sFrGNc8GH_7llJGM-81g[/twitter]

MUST READ:

“The referendum here came down to fewer than 90,000 out of more than three million votes.

It is completely plausible that such a small percentage of the electorate was impermissibly influenced by the subjective, normative, politically charged declaration on the ballot that the proposed amendment would ‘restore fairness.’

Accordingly, the referendum likely violates the U.S. Constitution’s Elections Clause, and the Virginia Supreme Court should set aside its results.”

FULL STORY in the replies.

[/quote]

The question wording was completely fine. No one was confused. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics