Reply to Is this an attorney ethical violation?

Forum Index » Jobs and Careers

Reply to "Is this an attorney ethical violation?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]No one here can tell you whether or not there was an ethical violation with regard to how this attorney performed in court. No one here knows whether or not the evidence that this young attorney was given actually should have been entered into evidence, or whether or not she actually should have been making objections, etc. Clients often don’t like the decisions that attorneys make with regard to what to do in court, what to enter into evidence, etc. But attorneys often know things that that client does not, for instance, whether or not things are admissible at all. Yes, that attorney had a duty of competence, and both she and the firm should have been making sure she was adequately prepared if she was very new to practice. But no one here is qualified to say whether she actually was or not.

As far as the NDA goes, your friend signed it. They took money, and they signed the NDA. Generally speaking, that is the end of the story. Literally. If this person is now wishing they hadn’t signed the NDA, for whatever reason, they can pay another attorney to look at it and see if there’s a way to get out of it and file a bar complaint. But no one here should be advising you on that. You’re gonna have to have an actual lawyer look at it and advise her as to whether or not the NDA is enforceable, and if it is whether she should be violating the NDA anyway.

Plenty to look at here. But none of it by random strangers on DCUM.[/quote]

I get all of that and trying to be succinct left a lot out of course. My basic question while trying to provide context is whether it’s ever ok for a firm to condition refunded money on not filing a bar complaint. [b]They obviously know there’s a basis for a complaint there, or else they’d say complain, we don’t care.[/b] [/quote][/quote]

I don't think there is anything obvious here.  Bar complaints are a pain and take away from billing.  Their NDA is explicitly comprehensive, but that doesn't mean they believe they are at risk of an adverse finding.  What I wonder is why the client did not seek alternative representation rather than continuing with someone they didn't trust.

I also don't think you can chalk up an adverse outcome to either bad lawyering or ineffective mentoring.  I rarely hear of a family law dispute where anyone is happy.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics