Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "BOE Spring Facilities and Boundaries Work Session #3"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]In the 2nd Work Session, MCPS made it seem one should use forecasts from CIP 2027, as that PDF shows both enrolled and transfer students for programming, at both HS and MS levels. But in the 3rd Work Session today, it’s back to using the “resident only” numbers for looking at utilization. What is the explanation? Wouldn’t “resident only” data mean some of the HS/MS especially will be at very different utilizations in 2027?[/quote] So at HS, MCPS was saying which programs will be at which school under new Regional Model. Did they ever say which programs are going where at MS level? Huh? "Resident only" just means "not including transfers/students enrolled in programs/consortium students/etc."[/quote][/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
