Reply to New petition asking for critical changes to the proposed regional model

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "New petition asking for critical changes to the proposed regional model"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]@Daniel - I am guessing you are the OP of the thread or in this forum

While I agree with you on having 3 regional magnets, your proposed regions is disproportionate.

You have:

Region A: (Largely composed of MCPS’s proposed regions 1, 3, and 4) Contains BCC, Blair, Churchill, Einstein, Kennedy, Northwood, Richard Montgomery, Walter Johnson, Wheaton, Whitman, Woodward, and Wootton.  Existing IB programs at Richard Montgomery and Kennedy.  Existing STEM program at Blair.

Region B: (Largely composed of MCPS’s proposed regions 2 and 5) Contains Blake, Crown, Damascus, Gaithersburg, Magruder, Paint Branch, Rockville, Sherwood, Springbrook, and Watkins Mill.  Existing IB programs at Springbrook and Watkins Mill.  New STEM program at either Gaithersburg or Magruder.

Region C: (Similar to MCPS’s proposed region 6) Contains Clarksburg, Northwest, Poolesville, Quince Orchard, and Seneca Valley.  IB program at Seneca Valley (currently local, becomes regional).  Existing STEM program at Poolesville

Region A has 12 schools
Region B has 10 schools
Region C has 5 schools

Region C needs more schools.

Region A also has Springbrook IB and Kennedy IB programs so why should RM be in Region A?

Move RM and Churchill to Region B in your proposal.

Move Damascus and Crown/Wootton@Crown from B to C.
[/quote]

Who is Daniel?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics