Reply to Anyone has had one child at Latin and one at BASIS?

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "Anyone has had one child at Latin and one at BASIS?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I would not be surprised to discover that there is not a single family in DC in this situation, but I imagine if there is, they might be reluctant to post here because they would be instantly recognizable to peopel who know their family![/quote]

I have one at Latin middle and one at BASIS in middle. We make it work. The schools are very different; different kids may thrive in different places. [/quote]

You are the unicorn!

Could you share your thoughts on the main differences? [/quote]

+1000

So few people have first hand experience with both schools. I'd love to hear the compare/contrast. [/quote]

Basis is very, very intense and the class sizes are pretty large in the early middle grades.  Highly motivated and driven kids tend to do well, but it is definitely not a school for all kids, despite what they say.  The lack of more sports teams is a problem. It’s not clear to me if the school is compliant with PE requirements (or even subject to them). My kid does sports outside of school fortunately.

Latin has a completely different vibe. Very small classes and love of learning, get to know your teachers well etc. But definitely not the same level of rigor at all (don’t come at me on this point — I really don’t have a serious issue with either school!). The two schools are very different IMHO so it is interesting to say the least that these are always the top picks. [/quote]

While the schools are very different, I think self-motivated, smart, ambitious kids do well at both. And that's not necessarily true at most MS and HS in the city. These are the two charters that both start in 5th about which that can be said, which is why they are hard to lottery into and why people discuss the in tandem. There are definitely kids who are a better fit for one over the other (though it can actually be hard to know that when your kid is in 4th grade) but there are also kids who would do well at both, get a good education, and be well prepared for college.[/quote]

I’m the PP, and I agree with all of that, including that it’s hard to know in 4th grade where your kid will thrive.  So, even if I did not think my kid would thrive at basis, I think in most cases it would be worth trying out 5th.  Of course that feeds into the high rate of attrition from that school. I also think it’s probably correct that a larger percentage of kids overall would thrive at Latin than at basis.  Not a dig, just a fact. [/quote]

I honestly don't know why other charters don't try to be the next BASIS or, especially, Latin. There is clearly a lot of unmet demand in this city for more rigorous schools. [/quote]

I can't find it now, but I once saw a PCSB presentation that showed seats/demand by grade band and geography. Seemed to be a guiding principle for granting new charters. Wonder if the way that shakes out has anything to do with it.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics