Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)
Reply to "NYT: Male SMV "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]This sounds like corporate negging. Tell men they need to improve their "sexual market value" and then sell them expensive products to do so. It's a monetization and corporatization of the very basic concept of presenting yourself nicely to people you want to date. Taking it to its expensive extreme. It's also toxic to anyone who actually wants to be in a relationship. If the idea is "maximizing" your own value, it follows you'd want a similar bid from someone with a similar "maximum" value. But that's never going to actually work in a relationship. You can't commodify compatibility. And leaves you chasing the next thing. Remember if you're in a committed relationship and not chasing anymore, they can't make money off you any more. Basically stuff like this is designed to keep you single and spending more money on their products.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
