Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "PK3 Lottery- Two rivers P St vs Mundo Verde P st"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Considering these two schools for PK3 and would like inputs from parents who have kids in either of these. We live walking distance from both and like that there is minimal to no technology use. Thank you [/quote] Above makes no sense. Either you prioritize spanish and immersion or you don’t. If you don’t prioritize spanish, don’t choose MV. Of all the immersion charters, MV has the strongest spanish and many non-hispanics families are either proficient or fluent in spanish. Go with TR. I hear the ECE is pretty good. As to some posters saying poor DCPS schools like JO or Langley, no way. Read the post about DCPS and screens in ECE. Total disaster and developmental inappropriate. And so easy to get into either schools if you want later anyway because families leave.[/quote] OP would hate Langley. But that's beside the point. OP needs to really think about why Two Rivers made so many waitlist offers. TR4 admitted 42 kids and waitlisted 49 (from 359 total applicants). Then made 36 waitlist offers, so probably got through their list. And you can add the Equitable Access data to that. Langley had 132 applicants, matched 42 and had a wait-list of 44, and then made just 4 waitlist offers. So Langley seems to have been the harder school to get into, and matched or waitlisted a higher proportion of its applicant pool than TR4 did. And this is *despite* TR4 having better CAPE scores than Langley, and *despite* TR4 having arguably a more appealing middle school than Langley feeds to, and *despite* having all the unappealing things about DCPS like too much screen time. What could account for Langley being overall more appealing than TR4? Really ponder this, OP.[/quote] Who cares about the waitlist? Langley is not hard to get into at all. [b]All DCPS schools are out because OP does not want screens.[/b] She is asking about MV and TR. There is no Langely and your desperation in trying to convince her is showing. [/quote] I would be very interested to see the basis for this week's brand-new DCUM truism that there are no screens in DCPCS. What?[/quote] No one said there are no screens in charter schools. Please try to stay focused here. OP wants no screen in ECE and TR and MV fit that criteria and DCPS schools don’t. Why is that so hard to understand or admit?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics