Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Real Estate
Reply to "More Evidence Squatting Legal in MoCo"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Can anyone explain why there are “squatters rights”? Or for that matter why there should be tenant’s rights if tenants refuse to pay their rent? I don’t mean tenant’s rights with regards to protecting tenants from abuse, fraud, inhabitable conditions, etc.; I mean why are there rights when tenants simply refuse to pay their rent.[/quote] A lot of these things have very long historical antecedents. Imagine you’re a person in 16th century Europe and come upon an abandoned house. So you move in and fix it up. No one ever comes around to tell you it’s theirs and the original owner maybe died of plague or killed in battle or whatever. That’s the concept behind eminent domain and it makes a lot of sense. It looks to me like the blame here rests mostly on the bank which is an absentee landlord. If the squatter is causing issues, th neighbors should threaten to sue the bank for creating a public nuisance by failing to maintain/secure th property. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics