Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "WJ: Intelligence whistleblower complaint against Tulsi Gabbard so sensitive, it's locked in a safe"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Kind of silly to focus on the safe. Obviously everything in the DNI is going to be called national security sensitive. It's the standard way the government covers up internal corruption. [/quote] The point is that the complaint was filed in May of last year and 8 months later the administration is still stonewalling and trying to decide how to handle the case and whether or not Congress should even be allowed to see information about the case. While whistleblower cases no doubt have occurred before involving the national intelligence agencies, it's the amount of time that has passed without dealing with the case that is unprecedented. And the comment about the safe suggests that whatever is in the complaint is a BFD and potentially hugely explosive. "[b]The lengthy delay on sending the complaint to Congress is without known precedent[/b], according to watchdog experts and former intelligence officials. The inspector general is generally required to assess whether the complaint is credible within two weeks of receiving it, and share it with lawmakers within another week if it determines it is credible." [/quote] why does the administration get to decide?! [/quote] They don't, or they aren't supposed to. Interesting story - clearly the lawyer for the whistleblower is doing a shot across the bow here. I'm going to speculate the other agency is NSA or FBI and this involves wiretapping/intercepting communications of a US citizen, possibly a political rival or enemy, and that Trump himself ordered it. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics