Reply to Red Pill Incel vs Volunatary submissive males

Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)

Reply to "Red Pill Incel vs Volunatary submissive males"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I don’t think OP even understands what these two things are. They aren’t remotely similar.

An incel is a man who considers themselves “involuntarily celibate.” They believe themselves to be masters of sexual prowess and they’re being unfairly denied. They lack self-awareness about how they’re fundamentally unattractive for whatever reason (looks, status, money, social skills) and as a result are Big Mad about this and think women owe it to them to have sex. Because of the natural order of things, or something. They adopt Red Pill stuff and cosplay as macho and alphas but in reality are pathetic betas.

Cucks are the complete opposite. For one thing, they’re partnered. And they’re getting laid. It’s a sexual kink — they’re voyeurs only they want to watch their wives or partners have sex with another man, typically a well-hung black one (a “bull” in the fetish nomenclature). Then — and this is key to the fantasy — they “reclaim” her. They get “sloppy seconds.”  Gross, I know, and it’s hard to know how real this is versus just a porn subgenre like stepmoms having stepsons. But that’s the genre.

Thing is, incels are by and large stupid. It’s one of the many reasons they can’t get laid. And in their weird little, whiny subculture, they have somehow deduced that a cuck is simply a guy who can’t control his woman (they are big on controlling women, even though none have ever had one, as this controlling attitude is another huge turn-off) is a “cuck.” Any man who in any way acts subservient or deferential to a woman is, to them, a “cuck.” They think this is some huge insult.

And in their weird little echo chamber, it is. But the rest of the real world, which just regards incels as Big Mad Pouty Young Men and really has no understanding or awareness of cuckolding, it’s not. It’s just another weird, fringe term these losers who can’t get laid hurl at each other between Grindr meetups.

So my guess is OP, who doesn’t seem particularly smart, is an incel. Whether or not he gets his dick wet on Grindr is for another thread. [/quote]

I disagree. I think that incels are below average mad that women won't worship them and lust after them like they do more attractive and successful men. They want women to lower their standards to them.

While I think cucks are far better than incels, they have to acknowledge their faults, and they sexualize them, but in return are more successful with women. For one, because they arent blaming women. The fact they take pleasure out of letting their partner explore, is a much more evolved and emotionally mature state.

An incel would be a terrible husband because he hates women. A cuck would be a great husband because he puts their partners needs above their own.[/quote]

Different poster.  
I don’t see a “cuck” as “letting his partner explore” if the idea is that she is supposed to be “exploring” in the exact way that fulfills his sexual fantasy.  
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics