Reply to SSIMS activists spreading misinformation about boundary options

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "SSIMS activists spreading misinformation about boundary options "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Options E-G were introduced specifically to show where students would go if SSIMS closes. They were only created because of October announcement of the CIP -- see this article:
https://bethesdamagazine.com/2025/10/31/mcps-boundary-options-silver-spring-international-crown/#:~:text=The%20Montgomery%20County%20Public%20Schools%20(MCPS)%20board,*%20Alleviating%20space%20needs%20across%20the%20district

I do not understand how these options would be feasible if SSIMS stays open. Their entire purpose was to show how assignments would work if the CIP as proposed (including the closure of SSIMS) passes.

If that is not the case, it is MCPS who is misleading people, not a group of parents.

[/quote]

SSIMS was never supposed to close until 2030, but the new boundaries take effect in 2027.  MCPS had a plan for 2027-2030 which was to keep the Silver Spring middle school assignments basically as-is.  There is no reason I can think of why it isn't feasible to do that indefinitely if options E-G are selected and the decision is eventually made to keep SSIMS open.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics