Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "SSIMS activists spreading misinformation about boundary options "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Options E-G were introduced specifically to show where students would go if SSIMS closes. They were only created because of October announcement of the CIP -- see this article: https://bethesdamagazine.com/2025/10/31/mcps-boundary-options-silver-spring-international-crown/#:~:text=The%20Montgomery%20County%20Public%20Schools%20(MCPS)%20board,*%20Alleviating%20space%20needs%20across%20the%20district I do not understand how these options would be feasible if SSIMS stays open. Their entire purpose was to show how assignments would work if the CIP as proposed (including the closure of SSIMS) passes. If that is not the case, it is MCPS who is misleading people, not a group of parents. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
